No other state except Ellas-Greece has the right under the INTERNATIONAL TREATY OF LAUSANNE to issue NAVTEX messages in Ellas Territorial Waters
The recent turkish navtex messages—specifically navtex 0060/26 (issued by Izmir Station) and navtex 0880/25 (issued by Antalya Station) in late January 2026—are unilateral acts lacking any legal foundation in the Treaty of Lausanne.
Turkey's official marine spatial planning map (published in recent years), showing extensive Turkish-claimed or regulated maritime zones across the Aegean and beyond (shaded areas including energy, traffic, and security zones)—this broadly encompasses the eastern Aegean areas referenced in the 2026 NAVTEX claims
INTERNATIONAL TREATY OF LAUSANNE ANDOUBTABLE ORTHODOX ELLENIC AEGEAN BORDERS AND SEA EITHER THE FILTHY AND UNRESPECTABLE TURAN MONGOL TURKS LIKE IT OR NOT!!!
SO LET HISTORY TELL US EXACTLY WHERE THESE GUYS CAME FROM AND EXACTLY IN WHAT WAY AND MANNERS AND ''THEN WE SIT AND DΙSCUS AGAIN''!!!
No other state except Ellas-Greece has the right under the Treaty of Lausanne to issue NAVTEX messages in Ellas Territorial waters.
The Treaty of Lausanne, signed in 1923, definitively settled the territorial status of the Aegean islands following the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire. Articles 12, 14, 15, and 16 explicitly assign full sovereignty over the Eastern Aegean islands—including Lesbos (Mytilene), Chios, Samos, Ikaria, the Dodecanese group (such as Rhodes, Kos, and others), and Kastellorizo (Meis)—to Greece. Article 12 transfers sovereignty over these islands without reservation or exception for "grey zones." Article 15 states that Turkey renounces in favor of Italy (later ceded to Greece via the 1947 Paris Peace Treaty) all rights and title over the Dodecanese islands and adjacent islets. Article 16 provides that Turkey renounces all rights and title over islands situated more than three nautical miles from the Anatolian coast, thereby excluding any Turkish claim to sovereignty or residual rights over Greek islands or their appurtenant maritime zones.
Article 13 imposes a limited demilitarization regime solely on four islands: Lesbos, Chios, Samos, and Ikaria. This provision prohibits the establishment of naval bases and fortifications of a scale capable of supporting offensive operations, but it does not extend to a blanket ban on military presence, routine exercises, defensive deployments, or any lawful activities within the territorial waters of these or any other islands. Critically, Article 13 grants no authority whatsoever to Turkey—or any third state—to monitor, regulate, or issue directives concerning activities in the territorial waters or airspace of these islands. The demilitarization obligation is bilateral and enforceable through the mechanisms of the Treaty itself, not through unilateral Turkish navigational warnings.
No provision in the Treaty of Lausanne confers upon Turkey the competence to issue NAVTEX messages (navigational telex warnings under the International Convention on the Safety of Life at Sea) in Greek Territorial Waters, to demand prior coordination for scientific research or other activities therein, or to impose restrictions beyond the explicit text of Article 13. NAVTEX issuance in foreign territorial waters constitutes an exercise of jurisdictional authority that infringes upon the coastal state's sovereignty under customary international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), principles that reflect rules binding even on non-parties like Turkey through general custom.
The recent turkish navtex messages—specifically navtex 0060/26 (issued by Izmir Station) and navtex 0880/25 (issued by Antalya Station) in late January 2026—are unilateral acts lacking any legal foundation in the Treaty of Lausanne. NAVTEX 0060/26 asserts turkish jurisdiction over what it describes as its continental shelf in the Aegean Sea (areas "yet to be delimited by coastal states"), demands that all research activities in those zones be coordinated with turkish authorities, and effectively claims regulatory control over extensive maritime areas east of the approximate 25th meridian, which bisects the Aegean and encompasses large portions of Greek territorial waters and continental shelf entitlements derived from the islands. NAVTEX 0880/25 extends this approach by declaring a "permanent demilitarization status" for 23 Greek islands (including Lesbos, Chios, Samos, Ikaria, Rhodes, Kos, Kastellorizo, and others such as Thasos, Samothrace, Lemnos, Psara, Astypalaia, Karpathos, Kasos, Tilos, Nisyros, and Chalki), encompassing their territorial waters and alleging violations by Greek military activities therein. These assertions grossly exceed the limited scope of Article 13 (which applies only to four islands and only to fortifications and naval bases) and directly challenge Greece's established sovereignty as confirmed by the Treaty.
These navtex messages are therefore unilateral, illegal under international law, and constitute a clear violation of the Treaty of Lausanne by attempting to undermine Greece's full sovereignty over the islands (Articles 12, 14–16) and by misrepresenting and expanding the demilitarization regime beyond its explicit terms (Article 13). They have no basis in the Treaty text; on the contrary, they contradict its object and purpose of establishing permanent and definitive boundaries and rights.
Consequently, Ellas possesses an unimpeachable legal entitlement to respond through all available lawful means. This includes immediate diplomatic protests, issuance of counter-navtex messages affirming Greek sovereignty and jurisdiction, appeals to competent international organizations and bodies such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations Security Council, and the European Union, as well as the deployment of naval and air assets for monitoring, presence, and enforcement within its sovereign territory and maritime zones, provided such measures remain proportionate and consistent with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter on the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense against armed attack or threats to territorial integrity.
All the above constitute defensive affirmations of rights that are unequivocally recognized by the 1923 Treaty and customary international law, and an absolute and unique right exclusively and solely for the protection of Ellas Sovereign Rights.
AND THIS LAST POINT SHOULD BE TAKEN VERY SERIOUSLY BY THE TURKS BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT FACE ONLY ELLAS BUT ALSO ALL THE POWERS OF THE EARTH AND ESPECIALLY THOSE OF THE HEAVENS ABOVE ALL.
THE FOX TURKEY, WITH THIS MISTAKE OF HERS, WILL BE CAUGHT BY ALL FOUR AND WILL END ONCE AND FOR ALL DEFINITIVELY AND IRREVOCABLY!!!